COUNT II-FALSE INFORMING

State v. Big Daddy-Conversion---Case Pending

Big Daddy v. Big Mamma Shakalaka---Hearing Today
State v. Big Mama Shakalaka- Hearing Today

Plaintiff submits written argument accusing Big Mama of Theft

Defendant Statement: Plaintiff was in fact in MY house and the the groceries sacked for the needy were in fact for the "Postal Food Drive" Plaintiff enters house and states "I am making Italian chicken for dinner. Do you have have any italian dressing to marinate the chicken in?" He then approaches said sack and begins to root thru the sack in an aggressive hostile manner. Defendant then advises that she does have italian dressing. Plaintiff then stops rooting thru the sack long enough to request that the Defendant furnish him with a package of boneless chicken breast. Plaintiff then makes further requests for side items of instant pototatos and vegtables. Plaintiff then took numerous items from said sack and left with them along with italian dressing, one pack of boneless chicken breast (that Defendant had to pay FULL price for), one package of Instant Mashed Potatos. Plaintiff has not returned any of the items to the Defendant. Further more Defendant states that the missing items from the snack sale during the yard sale were in fact consumed, however this was in payment for yard sales services. Defendant further states that no lawsuits or criminal charges were ever filed with regard to the missing holiday candy and the weight gain was a just "winter weight gain".

Court Ruling: The Court finds the Plaintiff's testimony to be ENTIRELY untruthful and the Court finds in favor of the Defendant and rules that the Defendant be entitled to a $1,000,000,000 Judgment for being falsely accusing Defendant of THEFT and MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. The Court further finds that Defendant was entitled to snacks as payment for yard sale services. Furthermore the statute of limitations has passed and the Plaintiff is unable to recover on the loss of any holiday candy. Judgment Payable within 30 days, payment in cash or cashier's check only NO PERSONAL CHECKS. Further more the Court finds that this incident should be forwarded to the Prosecutors office and an additional charge of False Informing be added to his CONVERSION CHARGE.

State v. Big Mama-Theft

Court Ruling: The court dismisses this action again Defendant. State's witness Big Daddy has proven to be a BIG LIAR. The Court advises the State that it does not have a leg to stand on due to the unreliability of its witness. The State advises that it will be pursuing State's Witness on charges of False Informing.

State v. Big Daddy-Count 1 Conversion-Count 2-False Informing

Victim files restitution form requesting that Defendant be in lifetime servitude to her.

Court Ruling: The Court finds the Defendant GUILTY without a doubt and sentences Defendant to lifetime servitude to Victim without possibility for parole and no good time credit. The court does not like to be an advocate for morality but suggests to Defendant that he is on a slippery road of deceit that will get him in yet more trouble. NO APPEAL WILL BE ALLOWED!